Kingdom Code Source Index
Back

New Testament translation tier list

How much does a translation let the Greek speak, and how much does it let the translators speak instead?

One question decides every placement: does this translation render what the Greek says, or what the committee thinks the Greek means?

The tier list as a chart. S: BLB, NASB 1995, LSB. A: ESV. B: NET, RSV. C: KJV, NKJV. D: NIV, CSB, NRSV Updated Edition. F: NLT, MEV, The Message, The Passion Translation.
The list at a glance. The reasons for every placement follow.

S tier

  • BLB (Berean Literal Bible)

    Word-for-word, with tense, mood and voice kept. It is open-source, so anyone who reads Greek can test its choices. Primary study tool, and the New Testament text in this index.

  • NASB 1995

    The most literal mainstream English New Testament, from the critical Greek text. Hard to read devotionally, which the list treats as the point. Primary study tool.

  • LSB (Legacy Standard Bible)

    More wooden-literal than the NASB, on the critical text. It comes from John MacArthur’s seminary, and that theology occasionally shows in interpretive choices.

A tierReliable, know the weaknesses

  • ESV

    Formal equivalence on the critical text, strong for word-level study. A Reformed committee, and that occasionally shows in passages on grace and works.

B tierUseful, proceed with awareness

  • NET Bible

    The main text favors readable English over strict literalism. Its 60,000-plus translator footnotes document every textual decision. Use it beside the NASB, not instead of it.

  • RSV

    Readability was a goal alongside literalism, so the committee smoothed the Greek in places. Solid critical text. For cross-reference, not a primary study Bible.

C tierWrong foundation

  • KJV

    The English is unmatched, but the base is the Textus Receptus (Erasmus, 1516), built from late manuscripts. It carries 1 John 5:7, Mark 16:9–20 and John 7:53–8:11, which are not in the oldest manuscripts. Use for rhetorical weight.

  • NKJV

    The KJV’s English updated, on the same Textus Receptus base. Its footnotes at least show where manuscripts disagree. Same additions, same tier.

D tierThe committee replaced the text

  • NIV

    The most popular English Bible, and thought-for-thought in method. The committee’s reading of what the text means replaces what it says, and the reader cannot see where.

  • CSB

    Mixes word-for-word and thought-for-thought, and the reader cannot tell where the line falls.

  • NRSVue

    Gender-inclusive language in places the Greek does not call for, a modern preference added to an ancient text.

F tierNot translations

  • NLT

    A paraphrase. Fine for introducing the story, not for building doctrine.

  • MEV (Modern English Version)

    A Textus Receptus base like the KJV, without the KJV’s English.

  • The Message

    A cultural paraphrase. Some passages work as commentary. It is not a study text.

  • Passion Translation

    Adds words and ideas found in no Greek manuscript. Do not use.

Study the New Testament
BLB, NASB 1995 or LSB.
Cross-reference
ESV, with the NET footnotes beside your primary.
Rhetorical citation
KJV, knowing its base.
Everything in D-tier
You are reading the committee, not the text.
Not translations
Remove them from your shelf.

Read the full essay

Support Kingdom Code